James

Cin7 is a powerhouse of inventory management. For many businesses, implementing it is a major milestone—it marks the transition from chaotic spreadsheets to a centralized system of record. But what happens when the software that was supposed to save you time starts to feel like it’s slowing you down? It is a common scenario in […]

Most companies don’t struggle with inventory because they lack software. They struggle because they don’t know where to look. On paper, the system is “working.” Stock levels exist. Orders ship. Reports run.But beneath that surface, small signals quietly pile up—signals that explain why teams stop trusting their numbers, why stockouts keep happening, and why inventory

Practical tools that improve accuracy, speed, and visibility without enterprise complexity Small and mid-sized warehouses are being asked to do more than ever. Faster fulfillment, tighter margins, higher customer expectations, and leaner teams have become the norm—not the exception. The mistake many SMBs make is assuming they need more tools to keep up. In reality,

Inventory problems rarely start with bad intentions. They usually start with a lack of visibility. A receiving shortcut here, a skipped scan there, a spreadsheet “just for safety,” and before long, no one fully trusts what the system says is on the shelf. That’s the problem Inventory Management Software (IMS) was designed to solve. But

For years, inventory software implementations have been drifting toward “remote by default.” Screen shares, digital checklists, and templated workflows promise faster go-lives and lower upfront costs.  On paper, it all looks efficient, but in practice, many warehouses still struggle after go-live. Accuracy slips. Adoption stalls. Teams quietly build workarounds. And months later, leadership wonders why

A new fiscal year often brings a familiar ritual: refreshed dashboards, updated reports, and a renewed focus on metrics. Inventory teams review last year’s numbers, leadership asks for better visibility, and everyone hopes that clearer data will lead to better decisions. But many warehouses start the year tracking more metrics than ever—and still struggle to

Turning year-end counts into year-round control For many warehouses, the new fiscal year starts with a sense of relief. The annual physical count is finished, numbers are reconciled, and finance finally has clean inventory values to work with. But too often, that accuracy is temporary. A few weeks into Q1, counts drift again. Adjustments creep

Most warehouses don’t fail because they chose bad inventory software. They struggle because they chose tools that didn’t actually fit how work gets done on the floor. It usually starts with good intentions. A demo looks clean. The feature list is long. The promise is that once the system is live, inventory accuracy improves, orders

Every year, sometime between the end-of-year rush and the first quiet week of January, the same conversation pops up: “We need to improve the warehouse this year. What should we budget for?” New tools. New equipment. More space. More staff. Better software. Faster hardware. Except, none of these improvements can fix the unsolved, underlying problem:

Most warehouses don’t fall apart because someone made a gigantic mistake, they slowly deteriorate because of small, everyday communication gaps that pile up until the entire operation feels like it’s running uphill. It’s rarely the forklift. It’s rarely the software. It’s rarely the inventory method. More often, the thing slowing everything down is the information